Home
Today's Posts
Login
RegisterPosted by: chandna rani
« on: September 05, 2023, 06:54:23 am »Although these positions were not expressed in the constitutional text, they served as ammunition for the Rejection campaign. The second plebiscite Facing the exit plebiscite, there were no major surprises in the organic ordering of the political forces. From Christian Democracy to the left, all parties were defined by Approve (although some leaders rebelled against the official position). All the parties on the right sided with the Rejection.
However, within both camps there was heterogeneity. Quite Phone Number List on, differences emerged between those who defended the idea of rejecting to maintain the current Constitution with some minor reforms and those who defended the perspective of a new constituent process. As the campaign progressed, the seconds took over all the spokespersons for the Rejection. On the Approval side, there was more resistance to discussing what would happen after the vote if the new text was imposed.
However, as the campaign progressed and the Approval continued far behind the Rejection in the polls, the pro-government parties, which supported the Approval, opened up to the idea that the new text required some reforms. In addition, it was accepted that it was important to commit to these changes in order to alleviate some of the population's resentment, for example, towards the implementation of plurinationality.
However, within both camps there was heterogeneity. Quite Phone Number List on, differences emerged between those who defended the idea of rejecting to maintain the current Constitution with some minor reforms and those who defended the perspective of a new constituent process. As the campaign progressed, the seconds took over all the spokespersons for the Rejection. On the Approval side, there was more resistance to discussing what would happen after the vote if the new text was imposed.
However, as the campaign progressed and the Approval continued far behind the Rejection in the polls, the pro-government parties, which supported the Approval, opened up to the idea that the new text required some reforms. In addition, it was accepted that it was important to commit to these changes in order to alleviate some of the population's resentment, for example, towards the implementation of plurinationality.